Breaking tradition: should biostatistics doctoral qualifying exams evolve to better serve our students' ability to demonstrate readiness to conduct independent research?

Bellamy SL, Sullivan LM

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530
Published
2025
Container
Frontiers in public health
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530,
  title = {Breaking tradition: should biostatistics doctoral qualifying exams evolve to better serve our students' ability to demonstrate readiness to conduct independent research?},
  author = {Bellamy SL and Sullivan LM},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Frontiers in public health},
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Breaking tradition: should biostatistics doctoral qualifying exams evolve to better serve our students' ability to demonstrate readiness to conduct independent research?
AU  - Bellamy SL
AU  - Sullivan LM
PY  - 2025
JO  - Frontiers in public health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530
ER  - 

APA

SL, B., & LM, S. (2025). Breaking tradition: should biostatistics doctoral qualifying exams evolve to better serve our students' ability to demonstrate readiness to conduct independent research?. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612530

Source records