A cost-utility analysis of the transcutaneous Osia System® compared to the percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant Baha® Connect for hearing loss in Spain

Serafín Sánchez-Gómez, Rubén Polo, Francisco Ibáñez-Ortigosa, Óscar Martínez-Pérez, Víctor Zamora, Jesús Cuervo

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029
Published
2026-06-24
Container
Frontiers in Public Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029,
  title = {A cost-utility analysis of the transcutaneous Osia System® compared to the percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant Baha® Connect for hearing loss in Spain},
  author = {Serafín Sánchez-Gómez and Rubén Polo and Francisco Ibáñez-Ortigosa and Óscar Martínez-Pérez and Víctor Zamora and Jesús Cuervo},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A cost-utility analysis of the transcutaneous Osia System® compared to the percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant Baha® Connect for hearing loss in Spain
AU  - Serafín Sánchez-Gómez
AU  - Rubén Polo
AU  - Francisco Ibáñez-Ortigosa
AU  - Óscar Martínez-Pérez
AU  - Víctor Zamora
AU  - Jesús Cuervo
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029
ER  - 

APA

Sánchez-Gómez, S., Polo, R., Ibáñez-Ortigosa, F., Martínez-Pérez, Ó., Zamora, V., & Cuervo, J. (2026). A cost-utility analysis of the transcutaneous Osia System® compared to the percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant Baha® Connect for hearing loss in Spain. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1829029

Source records