A scoping review on active vs. passive range of motion approaches to treat heterotopic ossification at the elbow.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417,
title = {A scoping review on active vs. passive range of motion approaches to treat heterotopic ossification at the elbow.},
author = {Siegel P and Smith S and Stark E and Burns C and Dionne TP},
year = {2024},
journal = {Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences},
doi = {10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A scoping review on active vs. passive range of motion approaches to treat heterotopic ossification at the elbow. AU - Siegel P AU - Smith S AU - Stark E AU - Burns C AU - Dionne TP PY - 2024 JO - Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences DO - 10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417 ER -
APA
P, S., S, S., E, S., C, B., & TP, D. (2024). A scoping review on active vs. passive range of motion approaches to treat heterotopic ossification at the elbow.. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1327417
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:16:44.162Z