Navigating the meta-crisis of generativity: adapting qualitative research quality criteria in the era of generative AI.
- DOI
- 10.3389/frma.2025.1685968
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- Frontiers in research metrics and analytics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/frma.2025.1685968,
title = {Navigating the meta-crisis of generativity: adapting qualitative research quality criteria in the era of generative AI.},
author = {Dahal N and Hasan MK and Ounissi A and Haque MN and Kapar H},
year = {2025},
journal = {Frontiers in research metrics and analytics},
doi = {10.3389/frma.2025.1685968},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1685968}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Navigating the meta-crisis of generativity: adapting qualitative research quality criteria in the era of generative AI. AU - Dahal N AU - Hasan MK AU - Ounissi A AU - Haque MN AU - Kapar H PY - 2025 JO - Frontiers in research metrics and analytics DO - 10.3389/frma.2025.1685968 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1685968 ER -
APA
N, D., MK, H., A, O., MN, H., & H, K. (2025). Navigating the meta-crisis of generativity: adapting qualitative research quality criteria in the era of generative AI.. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1685968
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:49:44.103Z