Reflective, formative, hybrid, and composite measurement models in social science research: a diagnostic construct-measurement alignment framework.

Kruasom T

Open source

DOI
10.3389/frma.2026.1870385
Published
2026
Container
Frontiers in research metrics and analytics
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/frma.2026.1870385,
  title = {Reflective, formative, hybrid, and composite measurement models in social science research: a diagnostic construct-measurement alignment framework.},
  author = {Kruasom T},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in research metrics and analytics},
  doi = {10.3389/frma.2026.1870385},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1870385}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reflective, formative, hybrid, and composite measurement models in social science research: a diagnostic construct-measurement alignment framework.
AU  - Kruasom T
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in research metrics and analytics
DO  - 10.3389/frma.2026.1870385
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1870385
ER  - 

APA

T, K. (2026). Reflective, formative, hybrid, and composite measurement models in social science research: a diagnostic construct-measurement alignment framework.. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1870385

Source records