Accuracy, precision, and efficiency of manual planimetry versus point counting for sectional area estimation in oral morphometry: a comparison using a simulated two-dimensional reference model.

Zhang C, Chen Y, Wang D, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Lin X

Open source

DOI
10.3389/froh.2026.1897801
Published
2026
Container
Frontiers in oral health
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/froh.2026.1897801,
  title = {Accuracy, precision, and efficiency of manual planimetry versus point counting for sectional area estimation in oral morphometry: a comparison using a simulated two-dimensional reference model.},
  author = {Zhang C and Chen Y and Wang D and Liu Y and Zhang Y and Lin X},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in oral health},
  doi = {10.3389/froh.2026.1897801},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2026.1897801}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Accuracy, precision, and efficiency of manual planimetry versus point counting for sectional area estimation in oral morphometry: a comparison using a simulated two-dimensional reference model.
AU  - Zhang C
AU  - Chen Y
AU  - Wang D
AU  - Liu Y
AU  - Zhang Y
AU  - Lin X
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in oral health
DO  - 10.3389/froh.2026.1897801
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2026.1897801
ER  - 

APA

C, Z., Y, C., D, W., Y, L., Y, Z., & X, L. (2026). Accuracy, precision, and efficiency of manual planimetry versus point counting for sectional area estimation in oral morphometry: a comparison using a simulated two-dimensional reference model.. Frontiers in oral health. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2026.1897801

Source records