Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489
- Published
- 2026-09-03
- Container
- Frontiers in Surgery
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489,
title = {Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
author = {Yiheng Zhao and Juan Xie and Ling Zhu and Jianna Zhang and Junhui Zhang},
year = {2026},
journal = {Frontiers in Surgery},
doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis AU - Yiheng Zhao AU - Juan Xie AU - Ling Zhu AU - Jianna Zhang AU - Junhui Zhang PY - 2026 JO - Frontiers in Surgery DO - 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489 ER -
APA
Zhao, Y., Xie, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2026). Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:44:37.723Z