Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yiheng Zhao, Juan Xie, Ling Zhu, Jianna Zhang, Junhui Zhang

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489
Published
2026-09-03
Container
Frontiers in Surgery
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489,
  title = {Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
  author = {Yiheng Zhao and Juan Xie and Ling Zhu and Jianna Zhang and Junhui Zhang},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in Surgery},
  doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU  - Yiheng Zhao
AU  - Juan Xie
AU  - Ling Zhu
AU  - Jianna Zhang
AU  - Junhui Zhang
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in Surgery
DO  - 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489
ER  - 

APA

Zhao, Y., Xie, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2026). Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1945489

Source records