Comparison of test performance of a conventional PCR and two field-friendly tests to detect Coxiella burnetii DNA in ticks using Bayesian latent class analysis
- DOI
- 10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714
- Published
- 2024-06-19
- Container
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714,
title = {Comparison of test performance of a conventional PCR and two field-friendly tests to detect Coxiella burnetii DNA in ticks using Bayesian latent class analysis},
author = {Maureen W. Kamau and Carmel Witte and Wynand Goosen and Mathew Mutinda and Jandouwe Villinger and Dennis Getange and Rua Khogali and Michael E. von Fricken and Eric Maurice Fèvre and Dawn Zimmerman and Yvonne-Marie Linton and Michele Miller},
year = {2024},
journal = {Frontiers in Veterinary Science},
doi = {10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of test performance of a conventional PCR and two field-friendly tests to detect Coxiella burnetii DNA in ticks using Bayesian latent class analysis AU - Maureen W. Kamau AU - Carmel Witte AU - Wynand Goosen AU - Mathew Mutinda AU - Jandouwe Villinger AU - Dennis Getange AU - Rua Khogali AU - Michael E. von Fricken AU - Eric Maurice Fèvre AU - Dawn Zimmerman AU - Yvonne-Marie Linton AU - Michele Miller PY - 2024 JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science DO - 10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714 ER -
APA
Kamau, M. W., Witte, C., Goosen, W., Mutinda, M., Villinger, J., Getange, D., Khogali, R., Fricken, M. E. V., Fèvre, E. M., Zimmerman, D., Linton, Y., & Miller, M. (2024). Comparison of test performance of a conventional PCR and two field-friendly tests to detect Coxiella burnetii DNA in ticks using Bayesian latent class analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1396714
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T15:08:25.295Z