Comparison of sEMG Onset Detection Methods for Occupational Exoskeletons on Extensive Close-to-Application Data.

Kreipe S, Helbig T, Witte H, Schumann NP, Anders C

Open source

DOI
10.3390/bioengineering11020119
Published
2024 Jan 25
Container
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/bioengineering11020119,
  title = {Comparison of sEMG Onset Detection Methods for Occupational Exoskeletons on Extensive Close-to-Application Data.},
  author = {Kreipe S and Helbig T and Witte H and Schumann NP and Anders C},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)},
  doi = {10.3390/bioengineering11020119},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020119}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of sEMG Onset Detection Methods for Occupational Exoskeletons on Extensive Close-to-Application Data.
AU  - Kreipe S
AU  - Helbig T
AU  - Witte H
AU  - Schumann NP
AU  - Anders C
PY  - 2024
JO  - Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/bioengineering11020119
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020119
ER  - 

APA

S, K., T, H., H, W., NP, S., & C, A. (2024). Comparison of sEMG Onset Detection Methods for Occupational Exoskeletons on Extensive Close-to-Application Data.. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020119

Source records