Evaluating the Quality of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts on Diabetic Foot: A Cross-Sectional Study with Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines14091943
- Published
- 2026 Aug 29
- Container
- Biomedicines
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/biomedicines14091943,
title = {Evaluating the Quality of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts on Diabetic Foot: A Cross-Sectional Study with Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.},
author = {Tonkic L and Rudan M and Milicevic Milardovic T and Vukovic D and Sanader Vucemilovic A and Rusic D and Bukic J},
year = {2026},
journal = {Biomedicines},
doi = {10.3390/biomedicines14091943},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091943}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the Quality of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts on Diabetic Foot: A Cross-Sectional Study with Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. AU - Tonkic L AU - Rudan M AU - Milicevic Milardovic T AU - Vukovic D AU - Sanader Vucemilovic A AU - Rusic D AU - Bukic J PY - 2026 JO - Biomedicines DO - 10.3390/biomedicines14091943 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091943 ER -
APA
L, T., M, R., T, M. M., D, V., A, S. V., D, R., & J, B. (2026). Evaluating the Quality of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts on Diabetic Foot: A Cross-Sectional Study with Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091943
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T11:05:07.296Z