Rifaximin Versus Norfloxacin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Missing-Data Sensitivity Analyses.
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines14102285
- Published
- 2026 Oct 9
- Container
- Biomedicines
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/biomedicines14102285,
title = {Rifaximin Versus Norfloxacin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Missing-Data Sensitivity Analyses.},
author = {Hu JH and Chang ML and Liu NJ and Sung KF and Hsieh YY and Chen CH},
year = {2026},
journal = {Biomedicines},
doi = {10.3390/biomedicines14102285},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14102285}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Rifaximin Versus Norfloxacin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Missing-Data Sensitivity Analyses. AU - Hu JH AU - Chang ML AU - Liu NJ AU - Sung KF AU - Hsieh YY AU - Chen CH PY - 2026 JO - Biomedicines DO - 10.3390/biomedicines14102285 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14102285 ER -
APA
JH, H., ML, C., NJ, L., KF, S., YY, H., & CH, C. (2026). Rifaximin Versus Norfloxacin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Missing-Data Sensitivity Analyses.. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14102285
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T18:50:50.875Z