How Cross-Cue Inconsistency Weakens the Adoption of AI-Generated Review Summaries: The Roles of Diagnosticity, Authenticity, and Review Dispersion.
- DOI
- 10.3390/bs16091516
- Published
- 2026 Aug 28
- Container
- Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/bs16091516,
title = {How Cross-Cue Inconsistency Weakens the Adoption of AI-Generated Review Summaries: The Roles of Diagnosticity, Authenticity, and Review Dispersion.},
author = {He W and Meng H and Lu X},
year = {2026},
journal = {Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)},
doi = {10.3390/bs16091516},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091516}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How Cross-Cue Inconsistency Weakens the Adoption of AI-Generated Review Summaries: The Roles of Diagnosticity, Authenticity, and Review Dispersion. AU - He W AU - Meng H AU - Lu X PY - 2026 JO - Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) DO - 10.3390/bs16091516 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091516 ER -
APA
W, H., H, M., & X, L. (2026). How Cross-Cue Inconsistency Weakens the Adoption of AI-Generated Review Summaries: The Roles of Diagnosticity, Authenticity, and Review Dispersion.. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091516
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T23:33:15.637Z