Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.
- DOI
- 10.3390/clinpract14010008
- Published
- 2023 Dec 30
- Container
- Clinics and practice
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/clinpract14010008,
title = {Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.},
author = {Miao J and Thongprayoon C and Suppadungsuk S and Garcia Valencia OA and Qureshi F and Cheungpasitporn W},
year = {2023},
journal = {Clinics and practice},
doi = {10.3390/clinpract14010008},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. AU - Miao J AU - Thongprayoon C AU - Suppadungsuk S AU - Garcia Valencia OA AU - Qureshi F AU - Cheungpasitporn W PY - 2023 JO - Clinics and practice DO - 10.3390/clinpract14010008 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008 ER -
APA
J, M., C, T., S, S., OA, G. V., F, Q., & W, C. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.. Clinics and practice. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:08:27.978Z