Computed Tomography-Navigation™ Electromagnetic System Compared to Conventional Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience.

Lanouzière M, Varbédian O, Chevallier O, Griviau L, Guillen K, Popoff R, Aho-Glélé SL, Loffroy R

Open source

DOI
10.3390/diagnostics11091532
Published
2021 Aug 25
Container
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/diagnostics11091532,
  title = {Computed Tomography-Navigation™ Electromagnetic System Compared to Conventional Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience.},
  author = {Lanouzière M and Varbédian O and Chevallier O and Griviau L and Guillen K and Popoff R and Aho-Glélé SL and Loffroy R},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics11091532},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091532}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Computed Tomography-Navigation™ Electromagnetic System Compared to Conventional Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience.
AU  - Lanouzière M
AU  - Varbédian O
AU  - Chevallier O
AU  - Griviau L
AU  - Guillen K
AU  - Popoff R
AU  - Aho-Glélé SL
AU  - Loffroy R
PY  - 2021
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics11091532
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091532
ER  - 

APA

M, L., O, V., O, C., L, G., K, G., R, P., SL, A., & R, L. (2021). Computed Tomography-Navigation™ Electromagnetic System Compared to Conventional Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091532

Source records