Tomographic 3D Ultrasound for Thyroid Volumetry—A Comparison Between Multiplanar 2D and 3D Imaging Methods
- DOI
- 10.3390/diagnostics16152329
- Published
- 2026-07-25
- Container
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/diagnostics16152329,
title = {Tomographic 3D Ultrasound for Thyroid Volumetry—A Comparison Between Multiplanar 2D and 3D Imaging Methods},
author = {Robert Roth and Zoe Reinke and Martin Siedlecki and Jan Luitjens and Martin Hügle and Johanna S. Enke and Christian Liska and Laura-Marie Feitelson and Constantin Lapa and Thomas Kroencke and Robert Bauer and Thomas Wendler},
year = {2026},
journal = {Diagnostics},
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16152329},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152329}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Tomographic 3D Ultrasound for Thyroid Volumetry—A Comparison Between Multiplanar 2D and 3D Imaging Methods AU - Robert Roth AU - Zoe Reinke AU - Martin Siedlecki AU - Jan Luitjens AU - Martin Hügle AU - Johanna S. Enke AU - Christian Liska AU - Laura-Marie Feitelson AU - Constantin Lapa AU - Thomas Kroencke AU - Robert Bauer AU - Thomas Wendler PY - 2026 JO - Diagnostics DO - 10.3390/diagnostics16152329 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152329 ER -
APA
Roth, R., Reinke, Z., Siedlecki, M., Luitjens, J., Hügle, M., Enke, J. S., Liska, C., Feitelson, L., Lapa, C., Kroencke, T., Bauer, R., & Wendler, T. (2026). Tomographic 3D Ultrasound for Thyroid Volumetry—A Comparison Between Multiplanar 2D and 3D Imaging Methods. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152329
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:42:26.213Z