Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice
- DOI
- 10.3390/diagnostics16182989
- Published
- 2026-09-15
- Container
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/diagnostics16182989,
title = {Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice},
author = {Betül Özbek Kurtul and Bağnu Dündar and Gül İpek Gündoğan and Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc and Tuğba Elgün and Asiye Gök Yurttaş},
year = {2026},
journal = {Diagnostics},
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16182989},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16182989}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice AU - Betül Özbek Kurtul AU - Bağnu Dündar AU - Gül İpek Gündoğan AU - Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc AU - Tuğba Elgün AU - Asiye Gök Yurttaş PY - 2026 JO - Diagnostics DO - 10.3390/diagnostics16182989 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16182989 ER -
APA
Kurtul, B. Ö., Dündar, B., Gündoğan, G. İ., Sevinc, S. K., Elgün, T., & Yurttaş, A. G. (2026). Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16182989
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:42:41.077Z