Food Defense Risk Assessment of an Edible-Coating Processing Line: A Comparative Case Study Using TACCP and CARVER+SHOCK.

Segovia-Bravo KA, Pintado CC, Pérez-Santín E

Open source

DOI: 10.3390/foods15172997
Published: 2026 Aug 26
Container: Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/foods15172997,
  title = {Food Defense Risk Assessment of an Edible-Coating Processing Line: A Comparative Case Study Using TACCP and CARVER+SHOCK.},
  author = {Segovia-Bravo KA and Pintado CC and Pérez-Santín E},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Foods (Basel, Switzerland)},
  doi = {10.3390/foods15172997},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15172997}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Food Defense Risk Assessment of an Edible-Coating Processing Line: A Comparative Case Study Using TACCP and CARVER+SHOCK.
AU  - Segovia-Bravo KA
AU  - Pintado CC
AU  - Pérez-Santín E
PY  - 2026
JO  - Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/foods15172997
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15172997
ER  -

APA

KA, S., CC, P., & E, P. (2026). Food Defense Risk Assessment of an Edible-Coating Processing Line: A Comparative Case Study Using TACCP and CARVER+SHOCK.. Foods (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15172997

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:32:56.217Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:32:56.208Z
doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:32:56.192Z