RETRACTED: Kaim et al. Why Does Monk Fruit Extract Remain Only Partially Approved in the EU? Regulatory Barriers and Policy Implications for Food Innovation. Foods 2025, 14, 2810

Urszula Kaim, Urszula Gawlik, Katarzyna Lisiecka

Open source

DOI
10.3390/foods15183303
Published
2026-09-18
Container
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/foods15183303,
  title = {RETRACTED: Kaim et al. Why Does Monk Fruit Extract Remain Only Partially Approved in the EU? Regulatory Barriers and Policy Implications for Food Innovation. Foods 2025, 14, 2810},
  author = {Urszula Kaim and Urszula Gawlik and Katarzyna Lisiecka},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Foods},
  doi = {10.3390/foods15183303},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15183303}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - RETRACTED: Kaim et al. Why Does Monk Fruit Extract Remain Only Partially Approved in the EU? Regulatory Barriers and Policy Implications for Food Innovation. Foods 2025, 14, 2810
AU  - Urszula Kaim
AU  - Urszula Gawlik
AU  - Katarzyna Lisiecka
PY  - 2026
JO  - Foods
DO  - 10.3390/foods15183303
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15183303
ER  - 

APA

Kaim, U., Gawlik, U., & Lisiecka, K. (2026). RETRACTED: Kaim et al. Why Does Monk Fruit Extract Remain Only Partially Approved in the EU? Regulatory Barriers and Policy Implications for Food Innovation. Foods 2025, 14, 2810. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15183303

Source records