Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study

Rosanne F. Vogel, Ronak Delewi, Jeroen M. Wilschut, Miguel E. Lemmert, Roberto Diletti, Ria van Vliet, Nancy W. P. L. van der Waarden, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Valeria Paradies, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Felix Zijlstra, Gilles Montalescot, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Mitchell W. Krucoff, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Pieter C. Smits, Georgios J. Vlachojannis

Open source

DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206645
Published: 2023-10-20
Container: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher: MDPI AG
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm12206645,
  title = {Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study},
  author = {Rosanne F. Vogel and Ronak Delewi and Jeroen M. Wilschut and Miguel E. Lemmert and Roberto Diletti and Ria van Vliet and Nancy W. P. L. van der Waarden and Rutger-Jan Nuis and Valeria Paradies and Dimitrios Alexopoulos and Felix Zijlstra and Gilles Montalescot and Dominick J. Angiolillo and Mitchell W. Krucoff and Nicolas M. Van Mieghem and Pieter C. Smits and Georgios J. Vlachojannis},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  doi = {10.3390/jcm12206645},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study
AU  - Rosanne F. Vogel
AU  - Ronak Delewi
AU  - Jeroen M. Wilschut
AU  - Miguel E. Lemmert
AU  - Roberto Diletti
AU  - Ria van Vliet
AU  - Nancy W. P. L. van der Waarden
AU  - Rutger-Jan Nuis
AU  - Valeria Paradies
AU  - Dimitrios Alexopoulos
AU  - Felix Zijlstra
AU  - Gilles Montalescot
AU  - Dominick J. Angiolillo
AU  - Mitchell W. Krucoff
AU  - Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
AU  - Pieter C. Smits
AU  - Georgios J. Vlachojannis
PY  - 2023
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm12206645
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645
ER  -

APA

Vogel, R. F., Delewi, R., Wilschut, J. M., Lemmert, M. E., Diletti, R., Vliet, R. V., Waarden, N. W. P. L. V. D., Nuis, R., Paradies, V., Alexopoulos, D., Zijlstra, F., Montalescot, G., Angiolillo, D. J., Krucoff, M. W., Mieghem, N. M. V., Smits, P. C., & Vlachojannis, G. J. (2023). Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:28:53.391Z