Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study.
- DOI
- 10.3390/jcm12206645
- Published
- 2023 Oct 20
- Container
- Journal of clinical medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm12206645,
title = {Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study.},
author = {Vogel RF and Delewi R and Wilschut JM and Lemmert ME and Diletti R and van Vliet R and van der Waarden NWPL and Nuis RJ and Paradies V and Alexopoulos D and Zijlstra F and Montalescot G and Angiolillo DJ and Krucoff MW and Van Mieghem NM and Smits PC and Vlachojannis GJ},
year = {2023},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
doi = {10.3390/jcm12206645},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study. AU - Vogel RF AU - Delewi R AU - Wilschut JM AU - Lemmert ME AU - Diletti R AU - van Vliet R AU - van der Waarden NWPL AU - Nuis RJ AU - Paradies V AU - Alexopoulos D AU - Zijlstra F AU - Montalescot G AU - Angiolillo DJ AU - Krucoff MW AU - Van Mieghem NM AU - Smits PC AU - Vlachojannis GJ PY - 2023 JO - Journal of clinical medicine DO - 10.3390/jcm12206645 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645 ER -
APA
RF, V., R, D., JM, W., ME, L., R, D., R, V. V., NWPL, V. D. W., RJ, N., V, P., D, A., F, Z., G, M., DJ, A., MW, K., NM, V. M., PC, S., & GJ, V. (2023). Direct Stenting versus Conventional Stenting in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A COMPARE CRUSH Sub-Study.. Journal of clinical medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206645
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:59:42.326Z