Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.3390/jcm15072783
- Published
- 2026 Apr 7
- Container
- Journal of clinical medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm15072783,
title = {Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.},
author = {Zheng X and Li T and Wang J and Gao L},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
doi = {10.3390/jcm15072783},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. AU - Zheng X AU - Li T AU - Wang J AU - Gao L PY - 2026 JO - Journal of clinical medicine DO - 10.3390/jcm15072783 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783 ER -
APA
X, Z., T, L., J, W., & L, G. (2026). Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.. Journal of clinical medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:38:10.500Z