Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Zheng X, Li T, Wang J, Gao L

Open source

DOI
10.3390/jcm15072783
Published
2026 Apr 7
Container
Journal of clinical medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm15072783,
  title = {Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.},
  author = {Zheng X and Li T and Wang J and Gao L},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15072783},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Zheng X
AU  - Li T
AU  - Wang J
AU  - Gao L
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15072783
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783
ER  - 

APA

X, Z., T, L., J, W., & L, G. (2026). Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.. Journal of clinical medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072783

Source records