Extraperitoneal vs. Transperitoneal Cesarean Section: A Systematic Literature Review of Safety and Outcomes.
- DOI
- 10.3390/jcm15166153
- Published
- 2026-08-07
- Container
- J Clin Med
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm15166153,
title = {Extraperitoneal vs. Transperitoneal Cesarean Section: A Systematic Literature Review of Safety and Outcomes.},
author = {Wolder D and Velemir L and Castel C and Błażuk-Fortak A and Michalska A and Kwas-Sarnacka K and Świercz G and Hendler I.},
year = {2026},
journal = {J Clin Med},
doi = {10.3390/jcm15166153},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166153}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Extraperitoneal vs. Transperitoneal Cesarean Section: A Systematic Literature Review of Safety and Outcomes. AU - Wolder D AU - Velemir L AU - Castel C AU - Błażuk-Fortak A AU - Michalska A AU - Kwas-Sarnacka K AU - Świercz G AU - Hendler I. PY - 2026 JO - J Clin Med DO - 10.3390/jcm15166153 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166153 ER -
APA
D, W., L, V., C, C., A, B., A, M., K, K., G, Ś., & I., H. (2026). Extraperitoneal vs. Transperitoneal Cesarean Section: A Systematic Literature Review of Safety and Outcomes.. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166153
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:08:22.198Z