Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison of Sternotomy, Mini-Thoracotomy, and Periareolar Approaches.
- DOI
- 10.3390/jcm15187200
- Published
- 2026 Sep 16
- Container
- Journal of clinical medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jcm15187200,
title = {Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison of Sternotomy, Mini-Thoracotomy, and Periareolar Approaches.},
author = {Kocaoğlu AS and Ece Eral B and Ovalı C},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
doi = {10.3390/jcm15187200},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187200}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison of Sternotomy, Mini-Thoracotomy, and Periareolar Approaches. AU - Kocaoğlu AS AU - Ece Eral B AU - Ovalı C PY - 2026 JO - Journal of clinical medicine DO - 10.3390/jcm15187200 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187200 ER -
APA
AS, K., B, E. E., & C, O. (2026). Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison of Sternotomy, Mini-Thoracotomy, and Periareolar Approaches.. Journal of clinical medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187200
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:49:36.338Z