Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation
- DOI
- 10.3390/jemr19030067
- Published
- 2026-06-09
- Container
- Journal of Eye Movement Research
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jemr19030067,
title = {Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation},
author = {Francisco Povedano-Montero and Álvaro Perales-Serrano and Daniela León Lobo and Rut González-Jiménez and Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa and Juan Cedrún-Sánchez},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
doi = {10.3390/jemr19030067},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19030067}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation AU - Francisco Povedano-Montero AU - Álvaro Perales-Serrano AU - Daniela León Lobo AU - Rut González-Jiménez AU - Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa AU - Juan Cedrún-Sánchez PY - 2026 JO - Journal of Eye Movement Research DO - 10.3390/jemr19030067 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19030067 ER -
APA
Povedano-Montero, F., Perales-Serrano, Á., Lobo, D. L., González-Jiménez, R., Bernárdez-Vilaboa, R., & Cedrún-Sánchez, J. (2026). Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess–Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation. Journal of Eye Movement Research. https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19030067
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T10:28:46.036Z