Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark.
- DOI
- 10.3390/jmahp14020030
- Published
- 2026 May 7
- Container
- Journal of market access & health policy
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/jmahp14020030,
title = {Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark.},
author = {Aballéa S and Toumi M and Wojciechowski P and Clay E and Falissard B and Simoens S and Auquier P and Capri S and Bernardini R and Ruof J and Fricke FU and Morales OS and Boyer L},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of market access \& health policy},
doi = {10.3390/jmahp14020030},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14020030}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark. AU - Aballéa S AU - Toumi M AU - Wojciechowski P AU - Clay E AU - Falissard B AU - Simoens S AU - Auquier P AU - Capri S AU - Bernardini R AU - Ruof J AU - Fricke FU AU - Morales OS AU - Boyer L PY - 2026 JO - Journal of market access & health policy DO - 10.3390/jmahp14020030 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14020030 ER -
APA
S, A., M, T., P, W., E, C., B, F., S, S., P, A., S, C., R, B., J, R., FU, F., OS, M., & L, B. (2026). Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark.. Journal of market access & health policy. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14020030
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:05:39.884Z