Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations
- DOI
- 10.3390/medicina61071216
- Published
- 2025-07-03
- Container
- Medicina
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/medicina61071216,
title = {Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations},
author = {Valentina Billone and Giuseppe Gullo and Eleonora Conti and Silvia Ganduscio and Sofia Burgio and Giovanni Baglio and Gaspare Cucinella and Lina De Paola and Susanna Marinelli},
year = {2025},
journal = {Medicina},
doi = {10.3390/medicina61071216},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071216}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations AU - Valentina Billone AU - Giuseppe Gullo AU - Eleonora Conti AU - Silvia Ganduscio AU - Sofia Burgio AU - Giovanni Baglio AU - Gaspare Cucinella AU - Lina De Paola AU - Susanna Marinelli PY - 2025 JO - Medicina DO - 10.3390/medicina61071216 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071216 ER -
APA
Billone, V., Gullo, G., Conti, E., Ganduscio, S., Burgio, S., Baglio, G., Cucinella, G., Paola, L. D., & Marinelli, S. (2025). Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations. Medicina. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071216
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:17:44.360Z