Choosing Between Short-Read 16S, Full-Length ONT 16S, and Long-Read Shotgun Metagenomics for Soil Microbiome Studies: A Critical Review of the Benchmarking Evidence.

Albastaki A, Smith J

Open source

DOI
10.3390/microorganisms14051132
Published
2026 May 16
Container
Microorganisms
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/microorganisms14051132,
  title = {Choosing Between Short-Read 16S, Full-Length ONT 16S, and Long-Read Shotgun Metagenomics for Soil Microbiome Studies: A Critical Review of the Benchmarking Evidence.},
  author = {Albastaki A and Smith J},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Microorganisms},
  doi = {10.3390/microorganisms14051132},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051132}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Choosing Between Short-Read 16S, Full-Length ONT 16S, and Long-Read Shotgun Metagenomics for Soil Microbiome Studies: A Critical Review of the Benchmarking Evidence.
AU  - Albastaki A
AU  - Smith J
PY  - 2026
JO  - Microorganisms
DO  - 10.3390/microorganisms14051132
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051132
ER  - 

APA

A, A., & J, S. (2026). Choosing Between Short-Read 16S, Full-Length ONT 16S, and Long-Read Shotgun Metagenomics for Soil Microbiome Studies: A Critical Review of the Benchmarking Evidence.. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051132

Source records