Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sham Stimulation on Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Khawprapa S, Manimmanakorn N, Otaka Y, Saengsuwan J

Open source

DOI
10.3390/neurolint18090165
Published
2026 Aug 27
Container
Neurology international
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3390/neurolint18090165,
  title = {Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sham Stimulation on Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.},
  author = {Khawprapa S and Manimmanakorn N and Otaka Y and Saengsuwan J},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Neurology international},
  doi = {10.3390/neurolint18090165},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090165}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sham Stimulation on Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU  - Khawprapa S
AU  - Manimmanakorn N
AU  - Otaka Y
AU  - Saengsuwan J
PY  - 2026
JO  - Neurology international
DO  - 10.3390/neurolint18090165
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090165
ER  - 

APA

S, K., N, M., Y, O., & J, S. (2026). Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sham Stimulation on Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.. Neurology international. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090165

Source records