Gene Electrotransfer Efficiency in 2D and 3D Cancer Cell Models Using Different Electroporation Protocols: A Comparative Study.
- DOI
- 10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004
- Published
- 2023 Mar 21
- Container
- Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004,
title = {Gene Electrotransfer Efficiency in 2D and 3D Cancer Cell Models Using Different Electroporation Protocols: A Comparative Study.},
author = {de Caro A and Bellard E and Kolosnjaj-Tabi J and Golzio M and Rols MP},
year = {2023},
journal = {Pharmaceutics},
doi = {10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Gene Electrotransfer Efficiency in 2D and 3D Cancer Cell Models Using Different Electroporation Protocols: A Comparative Study. AU - de Caro A AU - Bellard E AU - Kolosnjaj-Tabi J AU - Golzio M AU - Rols MP PY - 2023 JO - Pharmaceutics DO - 10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004 ER -
APA
A, D. C., E, B., J, K., M, G., & MP, R. (2023). Gene Electrotransfer Efficiency in 2D and 3D Cancer Cell Models Using Different Electroporation Protocols: A Comparative Study.. Pharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031004
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T10:09:59.765Z