Is Redo Micro-TESE (Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction) as Effective as a Primary Micro-TESE in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)?
- DOI
- 10.3390/reprodmed7030047
- Published
- 2026-09-13
- Container
- Reproductive Medicine
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/reprodmed7030047,
title = {Is Redo Micro-TESE (Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction) as Effective as a Primary Micro-TESE in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)?},
author = {Mana Almuhaideb and Eviatar Fields and Abdullah Alahmari and Rakan Alhaidey and Armand Zini},
year = {2026},
journal = {Reproductive Medicine},
doi = {10.3390/reprodmed7030047},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7030047}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Is Redo Micro-TESE (Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction) as Effective as a Primary Micro-TESE in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)? AU - Mana Almuhaideb AU - Eviatar Fields AU - Abdullah Alahmari AU - Rakan Alhaidey AU - Armand Zini PY - 2026 JO - Reproductive Medicine DO - 10.3390/reprodmed7030047 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7030047 ER -
APA
Almuhaideb, M., Fields, E., Alahmari, A., Alhaidey, R., & Zini, A. (2026). Is Redo Micro-TESE (Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction) as Effective as a Primary Micro-TESE in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)?. Reproductive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7030047
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:41:48.094Z