An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage.
- DOI
- 10.3390/s16010091
- Published
- 2016 Jan 14
- Container
- Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/s16010091,
title = {An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage.},
author = {Shan G and Sun Y and Li M and Jungbluth KH and Maack C and Buescher W and Schütt KB and Boeker P and Lammers PS and Zhou H and Cheng Q and Ma D},
year = {2016},
journal = {Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)},
doi = {10.3390/s16010091},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010091}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage. AU - Shan G AU - Sun Y AU - Li M AU - Jungbluth KH AU - Maack C AU - Buescher W AU - Schütt KB AU - Boeker P AU - Lammers PS AU - Zhou H AU - Cheng Q AU - Ma D PY - 2016 JO - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) DO - 10.3390/s16010091 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010091 ER -
APA
G, S., Y, S., M, L., KH, J., C, M., W, B., KB, S., P, B., PS, L., H, Z., Q, C., & D, M. (2016). An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage.. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010091
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:38:48.547Z