Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment.
- DOI
- 10.3390/s26082320
- Published
- 2026 Apr 9
- Container
- Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/s26082320,
title = {Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment.},
author = {Johnston W and Franz A and Young S and Oliver R and Theis Z and McReynolds B and Dexter M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)},
doi = {10.3390/s26082320},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082320}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment. AU - Johnston W AU - Franz A AU - Young S AU - Oliver R AU - Theis Z AU - McReynolds B AU - Dexter M PY - 2026 JO - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) DO - 10.3390/s26082320 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082320 ER -
APA
W, J., A, F., S, Y., R, O., Z, T., B, M., & M, D. (2026). Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment.. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082320
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:16:08.682Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:16:08.694Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:16:08.701Z