Comparative Evaluation of Indirect Immunofluorescence and NS-1-Based ELISA to Determine Zika Virus-Specific IgM.
- DOI
- 10.3390/v10070379
- Published
- 2018 Jul 19
- Container
- Viruses
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3390/v10070379,
title = {Comparative Evaluation of Indirect Immunofluorescence and NS-1-Based ELISA to Determine Zika Virus-Specific IgM.},
author = {De Ory F and Sánchez-Seco MP and Vázquez A and Montero MD and Sulleiro E and Martínez MJ and Matas L and Merino FJ and Working Group for the Study of Zika Virus Infections},
year = {2018},
journal = {Viruses},
doi = {10.3390/v10070379},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/v10070379}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative Evaluation of Indirect Immunofluorescence and NS-1-Based ELISA to Determine Zika Virus-Specific IgM. AU - De Ory F AU - Sánchez-Seco MP AU - Vázquez A AU - Montero MD AU - Sulleiro E AU - Martínez MJ AU - Matas L AU - Merino FJ AU - Working Group for the Study of Zika Virus Infections PY - 2018 JO - Viruses DO - 10.3390/v10070379 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/v10070379 ER -
APA
F, D. O., MP, S., A, V., MD, M., E, S., MJ, M., L, M., FJ, M., & Infections, W. G. F. T. S. O. Z. V. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Indirect Immunofluorescence and NS-1-Based ELISA to Determine Zika Virus-Specific IgM.. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10070379
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:45:07.190Z