Commentary: Unintended consequences: what of quality outside the QOF?

James D Gubb

Open source

DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09x420644
Published: 2009-05-01
Container: British Journal of General Practice
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3399/bjgp09x420644,
  title = {Commentary: Unintended consequences: what of quality outside the QOF?},
  author = {James D Gubb},
  year = {2009},
  journal = {British Journal of General Practice},
  doi = {10.3399/bjgp09x420644},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09x420644}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Commentary: Unintended consequences: what of quality outside the QOF?
AU  - James D Gubb
PY  - 2009
JO  - British Journal of General Practice
DO  - 10.3399/bjgp09x420644
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09x420644
ER  -

APA

Gubb, J. D. (2009). Commentary: Unintended consequences: what of quality outside the QOF?. British Journal of General Practice. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09x420644

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:50:49.976Z