Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial
- DOI
- 10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1
- Published
- 2026-08-24
- Container
- Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Karachi
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1,
title = {Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial},
author = {Tingyang Dou},
year = {2026},
journal = {Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences},
doi = {10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial AU - Tingyang Dou PY - 2026 JO - Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences DO - 10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1 UR - https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1 ER -
APA
Dou, T. (2026). Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.333.1
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:15:18.455Z