An evaluation of EDAM coverage in the Tools Ecosystem and prototype integration of Galaxy and WorkflowHub systems
- DOI
- 10.37044/osf.io/79kje
- Published
- 2023-02-15
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.37044/osf.io/79kje,
title = {An evaluation of EDAM coverage in the Tools Ecosystem and prototype integration of Galaxy and WorkflowHub systems},
author = {Lucie Lamothe and Jennifer Rugaard Bregndahl Jensen and Hans Ienasescu and Ove Johan Ragnar Gustafsson and Alban Gaignard and Dmitry Repchevsky and Radka Svobodová and Tomáš Raček and Matej Antol and Magnus Palmblad and Matúš Kalaš and Hervé MENAGER},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.37044/osf.io/79kje},
url = {https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/79kje}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - An evaluation of EDAM coverage in the Tools Ecosystem and prototype integration of Galaxy and WorkflowHub systems AU - Lucie Lamothe AU - Jennifer Rugaard Bregndahl Jensen AU - Hans Ienasescu AU - Ove Johan Ragnar Gustafsson AU - Alban Gaignard AU - Dmitry Repchevsky AU - Radka Svobodová AU - Tomáš Raček AU - Matej Antol AU - Magnus Palmblad AU - Matúš Kalaš AU - Hervé MENAGER PY - 2023 DO - 10.37044/osf.io/79kje UR - https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/79kje ER -
APA
Lamothe, L., Jensen, J. R. B., Ienasescu, H., Gustafsson, O. J. R., Gaignard, A., Repchevsky, D., Svobodová, R., Raček, T., Antol, M., Palmblad, M., Kalaš, M., & MENAGER, H. (2023). An evaluation of EDAM coverage in the Tools Ecosystem and prototype integration of Galaxy and WorkflowHub systems. https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/79kje
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:28:42.183Z