When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association.
- DOI
- 10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7
- Published
- 2025 Dec 2
- Container
- Attention, perception & psychophysics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7,
title = {When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association.},
author = {Türkan BN and Schöpper LM and Vainio L and Frings C},
year = {2025},
journal = {Attention, perception \& psychophysics},
doi = {10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association. AU - Türkan BN AU - Schöpper LM AU - Vainio L AU - Frings C PY - 2025 JO - Attention, perception & psychophysics DO - 10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7 ER -
APA
BN, T., LM, S., L, V., & C, F. (2025). When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association.. Attention, perception & psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:21:08.905Z