Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.

Purcell ZA, Howarth S, Wastell CA, Roberts AJ, Sweller N.

Open source

DOI
10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8
Published
2021-08-13
Container
Mem Cognit
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8,
  title = {Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.},
  author = {Purcell ZA and  Howarth S and  Wastell CA and  Roberts AJ and  Sweller N.},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Mem Cognit},
  doi = {10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.
AU  - Purcell ZA
AU  -  Howarth S
AU  -  Wastell CA
AU  -  Roberts AJ
AU  -  Sweller N.
PY  - 2022
JO  - Mem Cognit
DO  - 10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8
ER  - 

APA

ZA, P., S, H., CA, W., AJ, R., & N., S. (2022). Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.. Mem Cognit. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8

Source records