Morphological analysis when morphemes are hard to detect: Evidence from infixation and reduplication

Dave Kenneth Tayao Cayado, Kathleen Rastle

Open source

DOI
10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y
Published
2026-10-23
Container
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y,
  title = {Morphological analysis when morphemes are hard to detect: Evidence from infixation and reduplication},
  author = {Dave Kenneth Tayao Cayado and Kathleen Rastle},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Psychonomic Bulletin \& Review},
  doi = {10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Morphological analysis when morphemes are hard to detect: Evidence from infixation and reduplication
AU  - Dave Kenneth Tayao Cayado
AU  - Kathleen Rastle
PY  - 2026
JO  - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
DO  - 10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y
ER  - 

APA

Cayado, D. K. T., & Rastle, K. (2026). Morphological analysis when morphemes are hard to detect: Evidence from infixation and reduplication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-03026-y

Source records