The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts
- DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- Container
- Behavior Research Methods
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x,
title = {The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts},
author = {Eva Landmann and Anne Böckler},
year = {2026},
journal = {Behavior Research Methods},
doi = {10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts AU - Eva Landmann AU - Anne Böckler PY - 2026 JO - Behavior Research Methods DO - 10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x UR - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x ER -
APA
Landmann, E., & Böckler, A. (2026). The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T08:03:35.685Z