If these aren’t genuine species, what are? An analysis of heterotypic synonyms contributes to 19 new names and 20 new combinations in Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). Part 2: New combinations

Christopher B. Callaghan, Siak K. Png

Open source

DOI
10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893
Published
2026-07-10
Container
PhytoKeys
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893,
  title = {If these aren’t genuine species, what are? An analysis of heterotypic synonyms contributes to 19 new names and 20 new combinations in Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). Part 2: New combinations},
  author = {Christopher B. Callaghan and Siak K. Png},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PhytoKeys},
  doi = {10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - If these aren’t genuine species, what are? An analysis of heterotypic synonyms contributes to 19 new names and 20 new combinations in Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). Part 2: New combinations
AU  - Christopher B. Callaghan
AU  - Siak K. Png
PY  - 2026
JO  - PhytoKeys
DO  - 10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893
ER  - 

APA

Callaghan, C. B., & Png, S. K. (2026). If these aren’t genuine species, what are? An analysis of heterotypic synonyms contributes to 19 new names and 20 new combinations in Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). Part 2: New combinations. PhytoKeys. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.277.195893

Source records