Vegetation survey methodology in arable weeds is reported with less detail from vegetation science than weed science

Jana Bürger, Filip Küzmič

Open source

DOI: 10.3897/vcs.105300
Published: 10
Container: Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3897/vcs.105300,
  title = {Vegetation survey methodology in arable weeds is reported with less detail from vegetation science than weed science},
  author = {Jana Bürger and Filip Küzmič},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)},
  doi = {10.3897/vcs.105300},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3897/vcs.105300}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Vegetation survey methodology in arable weeds is reported with less detail from vegetation science than weed science
AU  - Jana Bürger
AU  - Filip Küzmič
PY  - 2023
JO  - Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)
DO  - 10.3897/vcs.105300
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3897/vcs.105300
ER  -

APA

Bürger, J., & Küzmič, F. (2023). Vegetation survey methodology in arable weeds is reported with less detail from vegetation science than weed science. Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS). https://doi.org/10.3897/vcs.105300

Source records

doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:35:28.157Z