Mendelian randomisation for rheumatology: beyond hype-what it's good for, what it can't do, and how to read it critically.
- DOI
- 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574
- Published
- 2026 Sep 1
- Container
- The Journal of rheumatology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574,
title = {Mendelian randomisation for rheumatology: beyond hype-what it's good for, what it can't do, and how to read it critically.},
author = {Sung GCY and Au Yeung SL and Zhao SS},
year = {2026},
journal = {The Journal of rheumatology},
doi = {10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Mendelian randomisation for rheumatology: beyond hype-what it's good for, what it can't do, and how to read it critically. AU - Sung GCY AU - Au Yeung SL AU - Zhao SS PY - 2026 JO - The Journal of rheumatology DO - 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574 UR - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574 ER -
APA
GCY, S., SL, A. Y., & SS, Z. (2026). Mendelian randomisation for rheumatology: beyond hype-what it's good for, what it can't do, and how to read it critically.. The Journal of rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0574
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:33:54.781Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:33:54.773Z