Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.

Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayan S, Kundu AK, Chakraborty SC, Das RK, Bera MK

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.43091
Published: 2008 Jul
Container: Journal of minimal access surgery
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.4103/0972-9941.43091,
  title = {Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.},
  author = {Bansal P and Gupta A and Mongha R and Narayan S and Kundu AK and Chakraborty SC and Das RK and Bera MK},
  year = {2008},
  journal = {Journal of minimal access surgery},
  doi = {10.4103/0972-9941.43091},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.43091}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.
AU  - Bansal P
AU  - Gupta A
AU  - Mongha R
AU  - Narayan S
AU  - Kundu AK
AU  - Chakraborty SC
AU  - Das RK
AU  - Bera MK
PY  - 2008
JO  - Journal of minimal access surgery
DO  - 10.4103/0972-9941.43091
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.43091
ER  -

APA

P, B., A, G., R, M., S, N., AK, K., SC, C., RK, D., & MK, B. (2008). Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.. Journal of minimal access surgery. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.43091

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:15:51.286Z