Authors’ reply to the letter to the editor regarding “stented versus stentless pyeloplasty in adults: A systematic review of surgical outcomes and complications”
- DOI
- 10.4103/iju.iju_260_26
- Published
- 2026-06-30
- Container
- Indian Journal of Urology
- Publisher
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.4103/iju.iju_260_26,
title = {Authors’ reply to the letter to the editor regarding “stented versus stentless pyeloplasty in adults: A systematic review of surgical outcomes and complications”},
author = {Ankur Mittal and Anumanchi Dattasai Subrmanyam and Vikas Kumar Panwar and Deelip Kumar Singh and Omang Agrawal},
year = {2026},
journal = {Indian Journal of Urology},
doi = {10.4103/iju.iju_260_26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_260_26}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Authors’ reply to the letter to the editor regarding “stented versus stentless pyeloplasty in adults: A systematic review of surgical outcomes and complications” AU - Ankur Mittal AU - Anumanchi Dattasai Subrmanyam AU - Vikas Kumar Panwar AU - Deelip Kumar Singh AU - Omang Agrawal PY - 2026 JO - Indian Journal of Urology DO - 10.4103/iju.iju_260_26 UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_260_26 ER -
APA
Mittal, A., Subrmanyam, A. D., Panwar, V. K., Singh, D. K., & Agrawal, O. (2026). Authors’ reply to the letter to the editor regarding “stented versus stentless pyeloplasty in adults: A systematic review of surgical outcomes and complications”. Indian Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_260_26
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:47:53.536Z