Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology.
- DOI
- 10.4103/ua.ua_42_26
- Published
- 2026 Jul-Sep
- Container
- Urology annals
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.4103/ua.ua_42_26,
title = {Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology.},
author = {Baskaran R and Al-Gholmy O and Kamal W and Nedbal C and Panthier F and Traxer O and Bhojani N and Philip J and Somani BK},
year = {2026},
journal = {Urology annals},
doi = {10.4103/ua.ua_42_26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_42_26}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology. AU - Baskaran R AU - Al-Gholmy O AU - Kamal W AU - Nedbal C AU - Panthier F AU - Traxer O AU - Bhojani N AU - Philip J AU - Somani BK PY - 2026 JO - Urology annals DO - 10.4103/ua.ua_42_26 UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_42_26 ER -
APA
R, B., O, A., W, K., C, N., F, P., O, T., N, B., J, P., & BK, S. (2026). Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology.. Urology annals. https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_42_26
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:19:46.943Z