A bibliometric analysis of the most-cited studies on robotic nephrectomy versus laparoscopic nephrectomy: Citation trends and scientific influence

Ebill Fuji Edison, Ponco Birowo

Open source

DOI
10.4111/icu.20250710
Published
2026
Container
Investigative and Clinical Urology
Publisher
XMLink
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.4111/icu.20250710,
  title = {A bibliometric analysis of the most-cited studies on robotic nephrectomy versus laparoscopic nephrectomy: Citation trends and scientific influence},
  author = {Ebill Fuji Edison and Ponco Birowo},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Investigative and Clinical Urology},
  doi = {10.4111/icu.20250710},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250710}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A bibliometric analysis of the most-cited studies on robotic nephrectomy versus laparoscopic nephrectomy: Citation trends and scientific influence
AU  - Ebill Fuji Edison
AU  - Ponco Birowo
PY  - 2026
JO  - Investigative and Clinical Urology
DO  - 10.4111/icu.20250710
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250710
ER  - 

APA

Edison, E. F., & Birowo, P. (2026). A bibliometric analysis of the most-cited studies on robotic nephrectomy versus laparoscopic nephrectomy: Citation trends and scientific influence. Investigative and Clinical Urology. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250710

Source records