Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Esophagectomy.

Park JB, Hahm MI, Kim HK, Kang D, Park SY

DOI: 10.4143/crt.2025.1188
Published: 2026 Jun 19
Container: Cancer research and treatment
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.4143/crt.2025.1188,
  title = {Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Esophagectomy.},
  author = {Park JB and Hahm MI and Kim HK and Kang D and Park SY},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cancer research and treatment},
  doi = {10.4143/crt.2025.1188},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.1188}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Esophagectomy.
AU  - Park JB
AU  - Hahm MI
AU  - Kim HK
AU  - Kang D
AU  - Park SY
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cancer research and treatment
DO  - 10.4143/crt.2025.1188
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.1188
ER  -

APA

JB, P., MI, H., HK, K., D, K., & SY, P. (2026). Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Esophagectomy.. Cancer research and treatment. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.1188

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T14:40:20.032Z