Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo-surgical valve replacement for mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: rationale and design of the SURVIV randomised trial.

Siqueira DA, Abizaid AAC, Ramos AA, Issa M, Cervone AC, Bezerra CG, de Araripe Falcão BA, Cortes LA, de Freitas C Guimarães L, K São Thiago LE, Rezende M, Delamain TR, Togna DD, Assef JE, Vilela AA, Paladino AT, Pinto IM, Franchini K, Bhatt DL, Feres F

Open source

DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-25-01090
Published: 2026 Mar 16
Container: EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.4244/eij-d-25-01090,
  title = {Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo-surgical valve replacement for mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: rationale and design of the SURVIV randomised trial.},
  author = {Siqueira DA and Abizaid AAC and Ramos AA and Issa M and Cervone AC and Bezerra CG and de Araripe Falcão BA and Cortes LA and de Freitas C Guimarães L and K São Thiago LE and Rezende M and Delamain TR and Togna DD and Assef JE and Vilela AA and Paladino AT and Pinto IM and Franchini K and Bhatt DL and Feres F},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology},
  doi = {10.4244/eij-d-25-01090},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-25-01090}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo-surgical valve replacement for mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: rationale and design of the SURVIV randomised trial.
AU  - Siqueira DA
AU  - Abizaid AAC
AU  - Ramos AA
AU  - Issa M
AU  - Cervone AC
AU  - Bezerra CG
AU  - de Araripe Falcão BA
AU  - Cortes LA
AU  - de Freitas C Guimarães L
AU  - K São Thiago LE
AU  - Rezende M
AU  - Delamain TR
AU  - Togna DD
AU  - Assef JE
AU  - Vilela AA
AU  - Paladino AT
AU  - Pinto IM
AU  - Franchini K
AU  - Bhatt DL
AU  - Feres F
PY  - 2026
JO  - EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
DO  - 10.4244/eij-d-25-01090
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-25-01090
ER  -

APA

DA, S., AAC, A., AA, R., M, I., AC, C., CG, B., BA, D. A. F., LA, C., L, D. F. C. G., LE, K. S. T., M, R., TR, D., DD, T., JE, A., AA, V., AT, P., IM, P., K, F., DL, B., & F, F. (2026). Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo-surgical valve replacement for mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: rationale and design of the SURVIV randomised trial.. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-25-01090

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:48:50.116Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:48:50.128Z