Meta-research on reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence: are authors and reviewers encouraged enough in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals?
- DOI
- 10.4274/dir.2024.232604
- Published
- 2024 Sep 9
- Container
- Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.4274/dir.2024.232604,
title = {Meta-research on reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence: are authors and reviewers encouraged enough in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals?},
author = {Koçak B and Keleş A and Köse F},
year = {2024},
journal = {Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)},
doi = {10.4274/dir.2024.232604},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.232604}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Meta-research on reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence: are authors and reviewers encouraged enough in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals? AU - Koçak B AU - Keleş A AU - Köse F PY - 2024 JO - Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) DO - 10.4274/dir.2024.232604 UR - https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.232604 ER -
APA
B, K., A, K., & F, K. (2024). Meta-research on reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence: are authors and reviewers encouraged enough in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals?. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.232604
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:58:52.517Z