Comparison of the Blockbuster(TM) and Air-Q(®) Supraglottic Airway Devices as a Conduit to Blind Endotracheal Intubation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Control Trial.
- DOI
- 10.4274/tjar.2026.252084
- Published
- 2026 Aug 28
- Container
- Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.4274/tjar.2026.252084,
title = {Comparison of the Blockbuster(TM) and Air-Q(®) Supraglottic Airway Devices as a Conduit to Blind Endotracheal Intubation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Control Trial.},
author = {Pattanayak A and Kumar A and Sinha C and Kumar N and Kumar A and Kumar B and Kumar R},
year = {2026},
journal = {Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation},
doi = {10.4274/tjar.2026.252084},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.252084}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of the Blockbuster(TM) and Air-Q(®) Supraglottic Airway Devices as a Conduit to Blind Endotracheal Intubation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Control Trial. AU - Pattanayak A AU - Kumar A AU - Sinha C AU - Kumar N AU - Kumar A AU - Kumar B AU - Kumar R PY - 2026 JO - Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation DO - 10.4274/tjar.2026.252084 UR - https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.252084 ER -
APA
A, P., A, K., C, S., N, K., A, K., B, K., & R, K. (2026). Comparison of the Blockbuster(TM) and Air-Q(®) Supraglottic Airway Devices as a Conduit to Blind Endotracheal Intubation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Control Trial.. Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.252084
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:43:53.289Z